• European Marine Science
• Open Access close
• RS close
• Publikationer från Uppsala Universi... close

For climate-change impact studies at the catchment scale, meteorological variables are typically extracted from ensem-ble simulations provided by global and regional climate models, which are then downscaled and bias-adjusted for eachstudy site. For bias adjustment, different statistical methods that re-scaleclimate model outputs have been suggested inthe scientific literature. They range from simple univariate methods that adjust each meteorological variable individ-ually, to more complex and more demanding multivariate methods that take existing relationships between meteoro-logical variables into consideration. Over the past decade, several attempts have been made to evaluate such methodsin various regions. There is, however, still no guidance for choosing appropriate bias adjustment methods for a study athand. In particular, the question whether the benefits of potentially improved adjustments outweigh the cost of in-creased complexity, remains unanswered.This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of two commonly used univariate and two multi-variate bias adjustment methods in reproducing numerous univariate, multivariate and temporal features of precipita-tion and temperature series in different catchments in Sweden. The paper culminates in a discussion on trade-offs between the potential benefits (i.e., skills and added value) and disadvantages (complexity and computational de-mand) of each method to offer plausible, defensible and actionable insights from the standpoint of climate-change im-pact studies in high latitudes.We concluded that all selected bias adjustment methods generally improved the raw climate model simulations, but that not a single method consistently outperformed the other methods. There were, however, differences in the methods' performance for particular statistical features, indicating that other practical aspects such as computationaltime and heavy theoretical requirements should also be taken into consideration when choosing an appropriate biasadjustment method

Recent technological developments have increased the number of variables being monitored in lakes and reservoirs using automatic high frequency monitoring (AHFM). However, design of AHFM systems and posterior data handling and interpretation are currently being developed on a site-by-site and issue-by-issue basis with minimal standardization of protocols or knowledge sharing. As a result, many deployments become short-lived or underutilized, and many new scientific developments that are potentially useful for water management and environmental legislation remain underexplored. This Critical Review bridges scientific uses of AHFM with their applications by providing an overview of the current AHFM capabilities, together with examples of successful applications. We review the use of AHFM for maximizing the provision of ecosystem services supplied by lakes and reservoirs (consumptive and non consumptive uses, food production, and recreation), and for reporting lake status in the EU Water Framework Directive. We also highlight critical issues to enhance the application of AHFM, and suggest the establishment of appropriate networks to facilitate knowledge sharing and technological transfer between potential users. Finally, we give advice on how modern sensor technology can successfully be applied on a larger scale to the management of lakes and reservoirs and maximize the ecosystem services they provide. 10780-10794 45 20

Global and planetary change 215, 103895 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103895 Published by Elsevier Science, Amsterdam [u.a.]