
Scot and NI Forum for Env Research
Scot and NI Forum for Env Research
2 Projects, page 1 of 1
assignment_turned_in Project2017 - 2018Partners:SEPA, Transport Scotland, Scot and NI Forum for Env Research, SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY, Scottish Government +14 partnersSEPA,Transport Scotland,Scot and NI Forum for Env Research,SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY,Scottish Government,Inverclyde Council,National Centre for Resilience,University of Edinburgh,National Centre for Resilience,Scot and NI Forum for Env Research,SGN,Scottish Water,SNIFFER,Scotland Gas Network,Scotia Gas Networks (SGN),National Centre for Resilience,Transport Scotland,SW,Inverclyde CouncilFunder: UK Research and Innovation Project Code: NE/R009023/1Funder Contribution: 50,483 GBPProject Partners: Transport Scotland, Scottish Water, SGN, SEPA, Inverclyde Council, National Centre for Resilience, Climate Ready Clyde, Adaptation Scotland/SNIFFER a) Our objective is to develop a game based approach to understand climate change impacts and adaptation on interdependent infrastructures. Using Inverclyde as a case-study, we will develop a transferable approach that identifies local scale interactions and interdependencies, and allows diverse infrastructure partners to jointly think of adaptation solutions. b) Inverclyde is a local authority in the west of the Greater Glasgow region. The urban coastal strip forms a vulnerable corridor. Our project will bring together major infrastructure partners (Transport Scotland, Scottish Water, SGN), with regional partners (Clydeplan, Inverclyde Council), SEPA and national knowledge brokers (Adaptation Scotland, National Resilience Centre) in a 6 month project that focuses on using a game to develop a shared understanding of key multi-hazard risks to infrastructure in the region due to climate change. c) Despite increasing capability to assess specific climate risks to infrastructure, our partners need to better understand vulnerability of infrastructure systems to climate-influenced environmental risks, and key interdependencies between them. Key challenges identified include: (1) translating climate projections into impacts on infrastructure - in particular with event succession, cumulative effects, long-term stresses, and/or multiple hazards; (2) identifying key location hotspots where there is a high multi-operator composite risk that may not be recognised by current practice; (3) understanding interdependencies between infrastructures operations, including varying resilience levels in regulation and license conditions; (4) considering impact of services provided by infrastructures and the socio-economic implications of service degradation or failure. d) At the end of the project, our partners will have: (1) an improved understanding of why and when service interruptions may occur; (2) an improved understanding of the interactions between multiple infrastructure networks; (3) identified key hotspots where the greater risk may not be currently recognised; (4) identified key risks; and (5) access to a game approach for identifying key risks. e) We plan a 6 month project employing one PDRA and contracting out design and development of the card game component. The total cost of the project is £50,777.45 at 80% FEC (£62,596.81 at 100% FEC).
more_vert assignment_turned_in Project2008 - 2012Partners:URS/Scott Wilson, Royal Town Planning Institute, South Yorkshire Forest Partnership, SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL, RTPI +29 partnersURS/Scott Wilson,Royal Town Planning Institute,South Yorkshire Forest Partnership,SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL,RTPI,Yorkshire and Humber Regional Env Forum,ENVIRONMENT AGENCY,Arup Group Ltd,Scott Wilson,Yorkshire Water Services Ltd,Environment Agency (Solihull),University of Sheffield,Environment Agency,DEFRA,Yorkshire and Humber Regional Env Forum,Ove-Arup,Sheffield City Council,TISCO,Yorkshire Forward,Yorkshire Water Services Ltd,[no title available],Scot and NI Forum for Env Research,South Yorkshire Forest Partnership,Royal Inst Chartered Surveyors,H2OPE,Scot and NI Forum for Env Research,Sheffield City Council,Tata Group UK,H2OPE,University of Sheffield,Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors,Tata Steel (United Kingdom),Yorkshire Forward,EAFunder: UK Research and Innovation Project Code: EP/F007388/1Funder Contribution: 2,546,170 GBPUrban river corridors are experiencing rapid changes in land use and perceptions and offer opportunities to create sustainable, high quality, communities. The hypothesis of the URSULA project (Urban River Corridors and Sustainable Living Agendas) is that there are significant social, economic and environmental gains to be made by integrated and innovative interventions in urban river corridors. We will test this by providing a portfolio of new ideas, new tools and new data to support redevelopment of urban river corridors as places where people want to live and work, now and in the future. We will do this in cooperation with national and local stakeholders, including government, commercial, community and 'non-organised' groups of stakeholders. The key themes of our analysis and way of working are 'people' (living, working), 'river' (ecological goods and services), 'design' (possibilities for intervention and innovation) and 'values' (agents of change, measures of success). We will draw on case studies in Sheffield, the UK and beyond, and test our Outcomes with local stakeholders in Sheffield on the corridor of the River Don and its tributaries. In the design theme we will, with stakeholders, choose a set of new and current ideas which may benefit redevelopment of urban river corridors, for example use of rivers for building climate control, better storm water management, or new urban forms. New field data and design analyses will enable us to understand their potential benefits and impacts. From the field and modelling work in the river theme, a deeper understanding of how urban rivers deliver ecological goods and services to the river corridor will show how the design possibilities can be assessed. The values theme will provide new analyses of the financial and other benefits of urban redevelopment, as well novel tools (e.g. visualisation) to work with stakeholders and understand their preferences. All of these activities will take place within a close cooperation through the people theme with the stakeholder groups, who are central to the project's motivation and measures of success.
more_vert