In the 1980s it began to be possible to produce potentially unlimited quantities of human proteins by placing the gene defining them in a simple organism such as yeast. From this grew a new kind of medicine capable of treating conditions such as severe arthritis, haemophilia, growth deficiency, and some cancers that previously had no satisfactory treatments. As well as having great clinical value the resulting technology has become the basis of a new and fastest growing part of the pharmaceutical industry, described as biopharmaceuticals. Because the molecules involved are proteins, they are orders of magnitude larger and more complex than conventional drugs such as aspirin and their processing is much more demanding. They are also so complex that they cannot in general be characterised with precision except in relation to the methods by which they are made. That means the capacity to precisely define such processes is critical to clinical safety and commercial success. Full scale trials of the processes are so costly they can only be conducted once clinical promise is established but, given the number of factors governing processing of even first generation products, there have often been hold-ups so extensive as to delay availability to patients. UCL has pioneered micro scale methods that are sufficiently good at predicting efficient conditions for large scale performance that far fewer and better focussed large scale trials suffice. That resolves part of the problem but an even greater challenge is now emerging. The early biopharmaceuticals were in general the easiest ones to produce. The final scales were also relatively modest. Now, the next generation of biopharmaceuticals are more complex materials and with rising demand the scales are far larger so that processes push the boundaries of the possible. The combined complexity of the product and the process with so many variables to consider means that the managers need better systematic means of supporting their decisions. Already the cost of developing a single biopharmaceutical can exceed 0.7 billion and take 10 years. With more advanced biopharmaceuticals these figures tend to rise and yet the world's governments are facing a healthcare cost crisis with more older people. They therefore exert pressure on companies to reduce prices. Because the public wishes to have medicines that do not pose risks, regulations become ever more stringent so they are a major factor in defining the bioprocess. This also adds to the need for managers to have sector-specific decisional-support aids well grounded in the detailed engineering of the processes. Finally, it is now possible to apply molecular engineering to proteins and vaccines to enhance their therapeutic properties but this can also cause serious bioprocessing problems. The research vision developed with detailed input from UK industry experts will apply these methods as the foundation for another step change whereby much faster and lower cost information can be gathered and integrated with advanced decisional techniques to give managers a better foundation on which to base their policies. The academic team from leading UK universities provides the necessary continuum of skills needed to assess the ease of manufacture of novel drugs, the costs of processing and of delivery to patients. We will work with companies to test the outcomes to ensure they are well proven prior to use on new biopharmaceuticals. This will cut costs so that all the patients who might benefit can receive them and at the earliest possible date achieved within the severely restricted budgets now available to the NHS.

By 2025 targeted biological medicines, personalised and stratified, will transform the precision of healthcare prescription, improve patient care and quality of life. Novel manufacturing solutions have to be created if this is to happen. This is the unique challenge we shall tackle. The current "one-size-fits-all" approach to drug development is being challenged by the growing ability to target therapies to only those patients most likely to respond well (stratified medicines), and to even create therapies for each individual (personalised medicines). Over the last ten years our understanding of the nature of disease has been transformed by revolutionary advances in genetics and molecular biology. Increasingly, treatment with drugs that are targeted to specific biomarkers, will be given only to patient populations identified as having those biomarkers, using companion diagnostic or genetic screening tests; thus enabling stratified medicine. For some indications, engineered cell and gene therapies are offering the promise of truly personalised medicine, where the therapy itself is derived at least partly from the individual patient. In the future the need will be to supply many more drug products, each targeted to relatively small patient populations. Presently there is a lack of existing technology and infrastructure to do this, and current methods will be unsustainable. These and other emerging advanced therapies will have a critical role in a new era of precision targeted-medicines. All will have to be made economically for healthcare systems under extreme financial pressure. The implications for health and UK society well-being are profound There are already a small number of targeted therapies on the market including Herceptin for breast cancer patients with the HER2 receptor and engineered T-cell therapies for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. A much greater number of targeted therapies will be developed in the next decade, with some addressing diseases for which there is not currently a cure. To cope, the industry will need to create smarter systems for production and supply to increasingly fragmented markets, and to learn from other sectors. Concepts will need to address specific challenges presented by complex products, of processes and facilities capable of manufacture at smaller scales, and supply chains with the agility to cope with fluctuating demands and high levels of uncertainty. Innovative bioprocessing modes, not currently feasible for large-scale manufacturing, could potentially replace traditional manufacturing routes for stratified medicines, while simultaneously reducing process development time. Pressure to reduce development costs and time, to improve manufacturing efficiency, and to control the costs of supply, will be significant and will likely become the differentiating factor for commercialisation. We will create the technologies, skill-sets and trained personnel needed to enable UK manufacturers to deliver the promise of advanced medical precision and patient screening. The Future Targeted Healthcare Manufacturing Hub and its research and translational spokes will network with industrial users to create and apply the necessary novel methods of process development and manufacture. Hub tools will transform supply chain economics for targeted healthcare, and novel manufacturing, formulation and control technologies for stratified and personalised medicines. The Hub will herald a shift in manufacturing practice, provide the engineering infrastructure needed for sustainable healthcare. The UK economy and Society Wellbeing will gain from enhanced international competitiveness.