The concept of the 15-minute City (15minC) is critical to fostering transitions to sustainable mobility. However, two main barriers exist to its implementation: first, the 15minC principles are hard to transfer to urban outskirts; second, the lack of attention to the social dimension in the design and implementation of mobility and accessibility solutions. COMMON_ACCESS aims to tackle these shortcomings with two dimensions of novelty. First, central to our approach is the idea of 'Commoning accessibility', which interprets the ability to access facilities and amenities as a common good and recognises it as a social and material resource co-produced by and belonging to all its citizens. Accordingly, the operationalisation of commoning accessibility needs to consider integrally: The provision of facilities and amenities The provision of sustainable options for personal mobility and logistics to access them The social organisation of such services and mobility/logistic options and the role of communities in sharing services, optimising resources and abilities The second novelty stems from the observation that commoning is accepted in academia but has yet to be applied in practice. COMMON_ACCESS seeks instead to focus on the translation into practice of commoning with the study of 'commoning accessibility experiments', such as community-shared (e-) bikes, (e-) cargo bikes; community micro-mobility and Active Travel Hubs; mobile community services; citizen-based dataset community tools to enhance digital connectivity; community parcel lockers; community-led cargo bike deliveries. The overall objective of COMMON_ACCESS is to explore the concept of Commoning accessibility and investigate its operationalisation in the urban periphery and suburban contexts, working closely with local planning authorities, businesses, and communities. This will be realised by fulfilling five key objectives: Objective 1 (O1): Develop and apply methodologies to map and explore (the variety of) accessibility conditions for transport and land use in urban outskirts and beyond. O1 will generate insights on location-specific constraints, opportunities, and conditions for the 15mC in the outskirts. Objective 2 (O2): Develop and apply methodologies to map accessibility interdependencies and identify existing CA experiments in urban outskirts and beyond. O2 will generate insights into the social organisation of mobility/logistic options focusing on the role of communities in sharing services and optimising resources and abilities within urban peripheries. Objective 3 (O3): Understand opportunities for activating and designing new CA (transition) experiments. O3 will provide methods and tools to enhance the potential of communities to implement CA experiments (including financial and governance aspects) Objective 4 (O4): Develop and apply methodologies for estimating the potential impacts of CA (transition) experiments on travel behaviour and access to opportunities Objective 5 (O5): Identifying policy enablers and constraints to commoning accessibility. O5 will generate insights into the key barriers and enablers for up-scaling successful street arrangements, district conditions, and alternative mobility options, including potential strategies for achieving this. By way of testbeds in outskirts neighborhoods of six different metropolitan areas - the Metropolitan area of Amsterdam (NL), the Province of Bergamo (IT), the Province of East-Flanders (BE), the Metropolitan area of Munich (GE), the Province of Pavia (IT) and Oxfordshire County Council (UK)- COMMON_ACCESS will collaborate and exchange knowledge with self-organised communities, SMEs, neighbourhoods, and local authorities in different contexts.

"The project addresses the situation of prisons in the partner countries:Italy,Portugal,Spain, France. The common problems found in all partner countries are overcrowding, undersized staff, lack of constant training, lack of activities aimed at recovering self-awareness and self-esteem, lack of family relationships. The problem of social reintegration is exacerbated by the presence of foreign prisoners, often without the support of their families outside the prison and with great difficulties in terms of communication and understanding prison rules, so they often remain alone in their island and do not participate in the activities. With respect to the priorities analysed, we focused on the objectives described in the initial phase of the project: -Promote development to the problem of detention and execution of the sentence by acting proactively, supporting the person/citizen in such a delicate phase of the path to social reintegration through theatre therapy and other cultural activities that strengthen self-esteem. -Activate a process aimed at rebuilding an in-out community capable of facing the impact with greater awareness. Experiment with prevention-oriented actions and interventions for adolescent children in situations of fragility and ""social"" risk. -To provide linguistic and cultural mediation to guarantee equal rights to prisoners and their families.Participants in the project were inmates of the ""protected"" pavilion in Italy and Portugal: protected prisoners have long sentences resulting from sexual violence in the family and on minors, they must be ""protected"" from other prisoners who inflict even serious punitive acts on them. In France, the beneficiaries of the project were inmates with minor sentences who could continue the theatrical path outside with the Theatre de l'Opprimè; the Spanish partner contributed above all with an in-depth legal analysis of the prison situations in the partner countries and a comparison of the penitentiary rules and their application, thanks to this joint work and to the great professionalism and availability of the Administration of Pavia and Dr. Rossin who collected all the data i, We could publish the manual ""Utopia"". The number of inmates participating in the activities was not always constant, due to transfers from one prison to another for various reasons (family reunification, expulsion to the country of origin, anti-social behaviour...), but especially due to the pandemic, which prevented the constant running of activities and workshops for several months and led to a cyclical turnover of participants. A total of about 100 inmates participated in the drama and creative laboratories.A difficulty was also encountered in the participation of prison officers and operators in the educational area in the training course, which always focused mainly on the re-educational and non-punitive purpose of punishment, due to the undersized staff and the work shifts exacerbated by the pandemic, which did not allow for continuous presence. .In spite of this, there is a better and more peaceful relationship between the prisoners and the prison staff, who were made more aware of the importance of their work and how, improving the quality of their work, improved the behaviour of the prisoners. Another area of training concerned cultural-linguistic mediation, given the strong presence of detainees from non-EU countries (48%), especially from the Arabic-speaking area with which the greatest problems arise. After the specific training the Pavia prison requested a monthly presence of Mediators from the areas most present in the prison.This choice made it possible to reduce linguistic discomfort within the institutions, both as regards relations between prisoners and between foreign prisoners, prison workers and lawyers.The various theatrical and creative activities described and experimented during the project proved to be fundamental in expanding mutual knowledge and activating new approaches that can be used in future projects related to the world of detention: the theatre therapy conducted in Pavia by Stefania Grossi, Augusto Boal's Forum Theatre coordinated by Rui Frati in Paris, the Social Theatre conducted by Febronia Espada in Sintra. The impact on the participants was monitored in itinere by means of questionnaires, highlighting excellent results in terms of psychophysical well-being and improved relational skills.As far as management, are concerned, Each Association was responsible from the local point of view, about Communication and dissemination while the lead agency was responsible for reporting and general communication and of the final reports. The results of the comparisons in the artistic and legal fields are summarized in the specific guide which was printed in 4 languages ​​and distributed."