You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
A Typology of Stakeholders and Guidelines for Engagement in Transdisciplinary, Participatory Processes
A Typology of Stakeholders and Guidelines for Engagement in Transdisciplinary, Participatory Processes
This paper fulfils a gap in environmental management by producing a typology of stakeholders for effective participatory processes and co-design of solutions to complex social–environmental issues and then uses this typology for a stepwise roadmap methodology for balanced and productive stakeholder engagement. Definitions are given of terminology that is frequently used interchangeably such as “stakeholders,” “social actors,” and “interested parties.” Whilst this analysis comes from a marine perspective, it is relevant to all environments and the means of tackling environmental problems. Eleven research questions about participative processes are addressed, based on more than 30 years of experience in water, estuarine, coastal, and marine management. A stepwise roadmap, supported by illustrative tables based on case-studies, shows how a balanced stakeholder selection and real engagement may be achieved. The paper brings these together in the context of several up-to-date concepts such as complex, nested governance, the 10 tenets for integrated, successful, and sustainable marine management, the System Approach Framework and the evolution of DPSIR into DAPSI(W)R(M) framework. Examples given are based on the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Water Framework Directive, the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, the Framework Directive for Maritime Spatial Planning, as well as for Regional Sea Conventions. The paper also shows how tools that have been developed in recent projects can be put to use to implement policy and maximize the effectiveness of stakeholder participation.
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Greece
- University of Hull United Kingdom
coastal and marine management, Stakeholders, transdisciplinary research, Marine Science, implementation of MSFD
coastal and marine management, Stakeholders, transdisciplinary research, Marine Science, implementation of MSFD
3614
Barnard S. Elliott M. (2015). The 10-tenets of adaptive management and sustainability: an holistic framework for understanding and managing the socio-ecological system. Environ. Sci. Policy 51, 181–191. 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.008 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
Bidleman T. F. Atlas E. L. Atkinson R. Bonsang B. Burns K. Keene W. . (1990). The long-range transport of organic compounds, in The Long-Range Atmospheric Transport of Natural and Contaminant Substances, ed Knap A. J. (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 259–301.
BorjaÁ. Elliott M. (2013). Marine monitoring during an economic crisis: the cure is worse than the disease. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 68, 1–3. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.01.041 23465570 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
Borja A. Elliott M. Andersen J. H. Cardoso A. C. Carstensen J. Ferreira J. G. . (2013). Good environmental status of marine ecosystems: what is it and how do we know when we have attained it? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 76, 16–27. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.08.042 24054784 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
Boyes S. J. Elliott M. (2014). Marine legislation – the ultimate ‘horrendogram’: international law, european directives & national implementation. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 86, 39–47. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.055 25088540 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
Boyes S. J. Elliott M. (2015). The excessiv e complexity of national marine governance systems - has this decreased in England since the introduction of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009? Mar. Policy. 51, 57–65. 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.019 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
Boyes S. J. Elliott M. Murillas-Maza A. Papadopoulou N. Uyarra M. C. (2016). Is existing legislation fit-for-purpose to achieve Good Environmental Status in European seas? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 111, 18–32. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.079 27377000 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
Carvalho T. M. Fidélis T. (2013). The relevance of governance models for estuary management plans. Land Use Policy 34, 134–145. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.02.007 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
Christie N. Smyth K. Barnes R. A. Elliott M. (2014). Co-location of activities and designations: a means of solving or creating problems in marine spatial planning? Mar. Policy 43, 254–261. 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.06.002 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
Cinnirella S. SardàR. Suárez de Vivero J. Brennan R. Barausse A. Icely J. . (2014). Steps towards a shared governance response for achieving good environmental status in the mediterranean sea. Ecol. Soc. 19:47. 10.5751/ES-07065-190447 [DOI]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Popularity provided by BIP!- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Greece
- University of Hull United Kingdom
This paper fulfils a gap in environmental management by producing a typology of stakeholders for effective participatory processes and co-design of solutions to complex social–environmental issues and then uses this typology for a stepwise roadmap methodology for balanced and productive stakeholder engagement. Definitions are given of terminology that is frequently used interchangeably such as “stakeholders,” “social actors,” and “interested parties.” Whilst this analysis comes from a marine perspective, it is relevant to all environments and the means of tackling environmental problems. Eleven research questions about participative processes are addressed, based on more than 30 years of experience in water, estuarine, coastal, and marine management. A stepwise roadmap, supported by illustrative tables based on case-studies, shows how a balanced stakeholder selection and real engagement may be achieved. The paper brings these together in the context of several up-to-date concepts such as complex, nested governance, the 10 tenets for integrated, successful, and sustainable marine management, the System Approach Framework and the evolution of DPSIR into DAPSI(W)R(M) framework. Examples given are based on the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Water Framework Directive, the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, the Framework Directive for Maritime Spatial Planning, as well as for Regional Sea Conventions. The paper also shows how tools that have been developed in recent projects can be put to use to implement policy and maximize the effectiveness of stakeholder participation.