
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Selection of indicators for assessing and managing the impacts of bottom trawling on seabed habitats

handle: 11336/112829
Selection of indicators for assessing and managing the impacts of bottom trawling on seabed habitats
Abstract Bottom trawl fisheries are the most widespread source of anthropogenic physical disturbance to seabed habitats. Development of fisheries‐, conservation‐ and ecosystem‐based management strategies requires the selection of indicators of the impact of bottom trawling on the state of benthic biota. Many indicators have been proposed, but no rigorous test of a range of candidate indicators against nine commonly agreed criteria (concreteness, theoretical basis, public awareness, cost, measurement, historical data, sensitivity, responsiveness, specificity) has been performed. Here, we collated data from 41 studies that compared the benthic biota in trawled areas with those in control locations (that were either not trawled or trawled infrequently), examining seven potential indicators (numbers and biomass for individual taxa and whole communities, evenness, Shannon–Wiener diversity and species richness) to assess their performance against the set of nine criteria. The effects of trawling were stronger on whole‐community numbers and biomass than for individual taxa. Species richness was also negatively affected by trawling but other measures of diversity were not. Community numbers and biomass met all criteria, taxa numbers and biomass and species richness satisfied most criteria, but evenness and Shannon–Wiener diversity did not respond to trawling and only met few criteria, and hence are not suitable state indicators of the effect of bottom trawling. Synthesis and applications. An evaluation of each candidate indicator against a commonly agreed suite of desirable properties coupled with the outputs of our meta‐analysis showed that whole‐community numbers of individuals and biomass are the most suitable indicators of bottom trawling impacts as they performed well on all criteria. Strengths of these indicators are that they respond strongly to trawling, relate directly to ecosystem functioning and are straightforward to measure. Evenness and Shannon–Wiener diversity are not responsive to trawling and unsuitable for the monitoring and assessment of bottom trawl impacts.
- Wageningen University & Research Netherlands
- University of Rhode Island United States
- Washington State University United States
- University of Queensland Australia
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center United States
570, SCALLOP DREDGE, ecosystem approach to fisheries management, OTTER TRAWL, hydraulic dredge, HYDRAULIC DREDGE, systematic reviews, 001, META-ANALYSIS, meta-analysis, ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, otter trawl, systematic review, SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, beam trawl, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, scallop dredge, BEAM TRAWL, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, 2303 Ecology, ta415
570, SCALLOP DREDGE, ecosystem approach to fisheries management, OTTER TRAWL, hydraulic dredge, HYDRAULIC DREDGE, systematic reviews, 001, META-ANALYSIS, meta-analysis, ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, otter trawl, systematic review, SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, beam trawl, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, scallop dredge, BEAM TRAWL, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, 2303 Ecology, ta415
5 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).40 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
